Industry

Fewer tools, less manual work, and a pipeline that reflects how the firm actually closes.

Firms and agencies that sell expertise. The bottleneck isn't leads, it's the manual work between them: proposals, follow-up, onboarding, and the reporting that ties those together. Strygon automates the busywork and builds the internal tools around it.

Automationon new lead
1New lead arrives00:00Trigger
2Route by service & value00:01Step
3Text owner in under a minute00:47Step
4Log, tag, and schedule follow-up00:48Check
Runs on arrival · nobody has to rememberIllustrative
Professional servicesIllustrative panel

Focus

Pipeline architecture, automation, and internal tools.

AgenciesAdvisory & firmsB2B services
Vertical
Professional services
Covers
Agencies · Advisory & firms · B2B services
Known breaks
Recurring failure points, listed below
Architecture
Unchanged from every other vertical — only the breaks differ
Engagement
A defined build, or run under management

Diagnostic

Where this vertical reliably fragments.

Named before anything is proposed. The specific system still gets mapped, but these are the failure points that recur often enough to check for first.

Manual follow-up

Follow-up depends on a person remembering, so warm leads cool while everyone is heads-down on delivery.

Tool sprawl

Five tools that don't talk, each holding a piece of the truth, none of them the whole picture.

Onboarding drag

Every new client kicks off a manual checklist that eats a day of senior time that should bill.

Recurring in this verticalObserved pattern · not a claim about any one business

Scope

What Strygon builds for it.

The same architecture as every other vertical, aimed at the breaks above rather than at a generic checklist.

Pipeline and stage architecture that matches how the firm closes
Proposal, follow-up, and onboarding automation
Internal tools and dashboards for the numbers the firm runs on
Integrations that make the existing tools finally talk
In scopeScoped in writing before work starts

More

Other verticals on the same architecture.

Start

Start with what's broken.

Send the situation in a paragraph. Strygon comes back with a read on what's likely wrong and what it would take to fix, before anyone talks about price.

Most builds start withleads dying in an inbox., three half-finished pipelines., follow-up nobody owns., numbers that never agree., four vendors blaming each other.

What to send
A paragraph. What broke, and where it shows up.
What comes back
A read on what is likely wrong and what fixing it takes.
Price
The last conversation, not the first

 

The system, part by part

What gets built here, and why.

Every part of the architecture, aimed at what actually breaks in professional services. The build is scoped from these, not from a package.

The parts that matter most hereThe architecture does not change between them